The very same climate change lunatics who told us we would all be dead by now are demanding we surrender to authoritarianism to save the world


The integrity and validity of the United Nations is now in question after climate change lunatics took over the 2018 Climate Conference to demand financial servitude and global surrender to authoritarianism.

At the opening ceremony of the United Nations Climate Conference, Poland’s Sir David Attenborough began a ruse about climate change being “our greatest threat in thousands of years.” Attenborough warned that civilization is about to collapse, that the world is “facing a man-made disaster of global scale.”

“Time is running out,” he said, calling on global leaders to “act now.” What kind of action do climate change lunatics want? They want the world’s banks to invest hundreds of billions of dollars into their idea so they can supposedly find ways to reduce Earth’s temperature. It’s an over-hyped, one-sided, and uncanny proposal, but the authoritarians who want to manipulate the world economy and dictate the weather using geo-engineering are the ones hoping they can convince the world of this farce. The World Bank has already pledged to hand out $200 billion over five years to countries that take action on “climate change.” (Related: How Al Gore became the world’s first carbon billionaire.)

“Climate change” hysteria is about authoritarian control

Instead of promoting an abstract concept such as “climate change,” world leaders should be discussing actual strategies that enhance environmental and human health for adaptation to everything that is uncertain. Instead, climate change lunatics are certain that man’s actions are causing a global rise in temperature and propose that population control, taxation, and authoritarian rule is the ultimate solution.

“Climate change” should not be used to beckon financial subservience to some inane goal of removing carbon dioxide from the Earth. Isn’t carbon dioxide the very compound that spurs plant growth? Why are climate lunatics striving to control something that will cause climate consequences?

“Climate change” should be observed first as a natural occurrence, not as something that can be controlled through perpetual geoengineering of the atmosphere with experimental particles. The dire problem is that the elite want to reign over the skies and banking system with no regard to human health and environmental consequences imposed by their controlling experiments. In the short and long term, weather, climate, precipitation, and temperature all fluctuate, no matter where people live. Climate data is easily skewed and cherry-picked to prove the need for “financing solutions” that are just attempts for economic and population control.

While there are real environmental crimes occurring throughout the world, the world leaders at the U.N. Climate Conference are more worried about getting billions of dollars in financing for projects that aim to control the weather, block out the sun’s light, and eliminate the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. Even the mainstream media have come clean about chemtrails, how they will be used to fight “climate change.” If climate alarmists cared about “saving the world” then they would bring awareness and work toward ending the chemical pollution of the world via agro-chemicals, heavy metals, bio sludge fertilizers (pharmaceutical-infused human waste) radiation, and industrial smog, among other real problems.

Ironically, with all the jets carrying world leaders across the globe, the climate summit will be responsible for 55,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide emissions (the very problem U.N. officials are complaining about.) According to EPA figures, this amount of CO2 is equivalent to the amount emitted by 8,243 American homes. Instead of restricting America’s energy consumption and ridding the planet of ordinary people, maybe it’s more prudent to rid the world of the global elite and restrict their behaviors. They are the ones actually causing excessive CO2 emissions, burning through resources, and ignoring real environmental health threats as they inflate the world’s money supply for authoritarian rule and manipulation of the weather which would inflict even more consequences.

Sources include:

Dailywire.com

BBC.com

NaturalNews.com

NaturalNews.com

Biosludged.com



Comments
comments powered by Disqus

RECENT NEWS & ARTICLES